彩虹多多登录|彩虹多多返点

来源：彩虹多多客户端下载2024-08-04 17:48

数字赋能功能拓展——南浔持续提升城乡寄递服务******

　　深入推进快递业进村，构建城乡贯通、内外融合的现代快递物流网，对促进乡村振兴、推动共同富裕意义重大。湖州市南浔区以数字化改革为抓手，拓展融合多种服务功能，扎实推进城乡寄递公共服务均等化改革，城乡寄递服务水平和能效获得持续提升。2021年、2022年，该区连续两年承办全省邮政快递业“两进一出”工作推进会；2022年5月，作为全省城乡寄递公共服务均等化唯一试点承办现场会；南浔邮政管理局荣获2021年度全省邮政管理系统突出贡献集体奖。

　　“当前快递作为‘新开门七件事’之一，越来越成为城乡居民必不可少的生活方式。近几年，我区快递收派量平均以每年40%速度增长，但农村快递服务质效远不如城镇，广大农村仍然是快递发展的薄弱区，推动城乡寄递公共服务均等化改革，通过一系列举措为农村居民打造舒适便捷的寄递服务，是现实趋势更是民生实事。”南浔邮政管理局主要负责人说。

　　数字化改革背景下，数字赋能成了南浔推进城乡寄递公共服务均等化改革最为显著的特点。该区以农村快递100%通达为目标，深植“管服融合”理念，开发“村易递在线”应用，联合国家邮政局发展研究中心合作开发“村邮助手”APP，运用数字技术、优化寄递流程、构建指数模型，打造“快件追踪”“通达地图”“企业画像”“协同智管”四大应用场景，推动农村寄递“管”出效率、“服”出便利，覆盖全区144个行政村（城镇规划区外）177个点位、10个快递62个网点，在全省率先实现所有快递品牌100%进村。

　　在优化体系上，南浔着力探索农村寄递服务新路径。目前，南浔正在加快建设一个区级邮政快递共配中心、七个镇街快递园区、N个村级快递便民服务点（共富驿站），形成“1+7+N”的区、镇、村三级寄递物流体系。在全省首创镇街快递网点园区化管理模式，推进乡镇末端网点标准化建设，可有效破解快递网点安全隐患多、监管难等痛点。

　　寄递服务如何助力共同富裕？南浔也在作出有效探索。在村级快递便民服务点全覆盖基础上，南浔以快递进村为链接，发挥快递引流作用，在农房集聚区、未来乡村等人流较大的区域大幅推广建设共富驿站。共富驿站实行专人管理，进驻金融、通信、商超、团购、招工等业务，充分发挥快递、银行、通信等多方优势，打造以寄递服务为基础、综合服务全拓展的农村集成服务新样板，实现群众就近办事“最多跑一次”。全区建成以双林镇七星桥村、练市镇荃步村等为代表的共富驿站28个。

　　改革出效率。目前，南浔快递企业派件时间平均缩短0.5天/件，跨部门协同处理案件平均时间由3天缩短为1天。农产品年均出村量20万余件，其中“快递+红美人”成为全区首个业务量超10万件的寄递服务农产品项目，“快递+淡水鱼苗”年业务量超3万件。快递园区、共富驿站纳入强村公司建设管理，快递营业网点租金成为村集体经济收入的重要来源。同时，快递园区、共富驿站的建设，带来一定的人流和物流，带动周边消费和服务，提供了卫生保洁、门卫、分拣等多个岗位，解决了村民就业，加上共富驿站带动农产品出村进城，实现助力1000余农户户均增收5000元以上。（达才金）

彩虹多多登录

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.